Vendor agreement — analyzed
This is a real-feel example of what LexGuard returns. Your own analyses are private and never shared.
Three high-severity clauses tilt the agreement strongly toward Acme. The combination of auto-renewal, unilateral price increases, and asymmetric payment terms creates real lock-in risk.
Plain-English summary
Acme provides SaaS services to your company in exchange for monthly fees. The contract is structured as a 12-month commitment that auto-renews. You are responsible for all your own data, while Acme provides the platform "as-is" with limited liability. Payments are due Net-90, but late fees kick in after Net-30.
Key points before signing
- 1.You're locking in for 12 months minimum.
- 2.The cancellation window is only 30 days, days 90-60 before renewal.
- 3.Acme can raise prices any time with 30 days notice. No cap.
- 4.Service is provided "as-is" — no uptime guarantee.
- 5.Acme's total liability is capped at one month of fees, regardless of damages.
Red flags
Contract renews automatically for 12-month terms unless cancelled in writing between days 90-60 before expiration. A short, easy-to-miss cancellation window is a classic vendor lock-in tactic.
The vendor can increase fees with 30 days notice without any cap. There's no benchmark to inflation or industry rates.
You're required to pay within 90 days of invoice, but late fees of 1.5%/month apply after day 30. This asymmetry favors the vendor's cash flow.